An Algebraic Approach to Belief Contraction and Nonmonotonic Entailment
نویسنده
چکیده
The approach of Alchourrón, Gärdenfors and Makinson to belief contraction is treated algebraically. This is then used to give an algebraic treatment of nonmonotonic entailment in the context of a belief set. The algebra used is a preboolean algebra whose elements are sets of sentences and whose order relation is restricted entailment. Under plausible assumptions restricted entailment is computable. It can also be shown that ordinary entailment can be retrieved from the family of entailments with finite restrictions. Nonmonotonic closure or consequence C, defined algebraically, satisfies inclusion, supraclassicality and distribution, but satisfaction of idempotency and cumulativity depend on certain conditions being fulfilled. Casting the notions of belief contraction and nonmonotonic entailment in algebraic formalism facilitates the understanding and analysis of these ideas. For example, necessary and sufficient conditions are given for nonmonotonic closure to be equal to ordinary closure: C = Cn. © 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
منابع مشابه
Algebraic Belief Revision and Nonmonotonic Entailment: Results and Proofs
An algebraic approach to AGM belief revision and nonmonotonic entailment is defined. Results are stated and detailed proofs given. However this is not a survey article so the literature is not reviewed nor is there much reflective discussion. The algebra, PSEN, is a preboolean algebra whose elements are sets of sentences and whose order relation is restricted entailment. Restricted entailment i...
متن کاملOn Combinatorial Possible Worlds
Combinatorial worlds can be used to give an account of necessity and possibility. Both accessibility and similarity between worlds can be deened. In this paper, we claim that combinatorial worlds can form a knowledge representation framework, and provide an interesting approach to nonmonotonic reasoning and belief revision. We investigate such aspects of the combinatorial worlds framework as co...
متن کاملBelief Change in Nonmonotonic Multi-Context Systems
Brewka and Eiter’s nonmonotonic multi-context systems is an elegant knowledge representation framework to model heterogeneous and nonmonotonic multiple contexts. Belief change is a central problem in knowledge representation and reasoning. In the paper we follow the classical AGM approach to investigate belief change in multi-context systems. Specifically, we semantically formulate the AGM post...
متن کاملNonmonotonic Probabilistic Logics between Model-theoretic Probabilistic Logic and Probabilistic Logic under Coherence Nonmonotonic Probabilistic Logics between Model-theoretic Probabilistic Logic and Probabilistic Logic under Coherence
Recently, it has been shown that probabilistic entailment under coherence is weaker than model-theoretic probabilistic entailment. Moreover, probabilistic entailment under coherence is a generalization of default entailment in System P . In this paper, we continue this line of research by presenting probabilistic generalizations of more sophisticated notions of classical default entailment that...
متن کاملBelief Contraction as Nonmonotonic Inference
A notion of an epistemic state is introduced as a generalization of common representations suggested for belief change. Based on it, we deene a new kind of nonmonotonic inference relation corresponding to belief contractions. A number of representation results is established, covering both traditional AGM contractions and contractions that do not satisfy recovery.
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- J. Applied Logic
دوره 5 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2004